[root@pitonyak ~]# lsmod | grep -i nvidia
nvidia 12112133 40
i2c_core 25728 3 nvidia,videodev,i2c_i801
Without grep:
Module Size Used by
lp 9581 0
tun 14111 0
ppdev 7360 0
parport_pc 19600 0
parport 32310 3 lp,ppdev,parport_pc
fuse 61671 5
bnep 14195 2
bluetooth 202902 7 bnep
lockd 70080 0
rfkill 16336 3 bluetooth
ip6t_REJECT 4008 2
nf_conntrack_ipv6 7714 2
nf_defrag_ipv6 9115 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6
nf_conntrack_ipv4 8310 2
nf_defrag_ipv4 1513 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
xt_state 1306 4
nf_conntrack 67597 3 nf_conntrack_ipv6,nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_state
ip6table_filter 1655 1
ip6_tables 16776 1 ip6table_filter
binfmt_misc 6983 1
reiserfs 211389 2
nvidia 12112133 40
uvcvideo 56989 0
videodev 78689 1 uvcvideo
joydev 9567 0
snd_usb_audio 105405 1
snd_usbmidi_lib 18071 1 snd_usb_audio
snd_rawmidi 19878 1 snd_usbmidi_lib
snd_hda_codec_realtek 312967 1
media 11511 2 uvcvideo,videodev
v4l2_compat_ioctl32 7665 1 videodev
snd_hda_intel 24072 2
snd_hda_codec 85462 2 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep 6264 2 snd_usb_audio,snd_hda_codec
snd_seq 52186 0
snd_seq_device 5941 2 snd_rawmidi,snd_seq
i7core_edac 16001 0
snd_pcm 78498 3 snd_usb_audio,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
snd_timer 19372 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm
i2c_i801 9237 0
edac_core 40154 3 i7core_edac
snd 63124 17
snd_usb_audio,snd_usbmidi_lib,snd_rawmidi,snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_pcm,snd_timer
iTCO_wdt 12024 0
iTCO_vendor_support 2578 1 iTCO_wdt
soundcore 6267 1 snd
snd_page_alloc 7311 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
r8169 40493 0
asus_atk0110 12395 0
i2c_core 25728 3 nvidia,videodev,i2c_i801
microcode 18539 0
mii 4335 1 r8169
serio_raw 4298 0
uinput 7230 0
sunrpc 201219 2 lockd
ata_generic 3587 0
pata_acpi 3419 0
mxm_wmi 1727 0
firewire_ohci 26101 0
pata_jmicron 2643 0
firewire_core 49303 1 firewire_ohci
crc_itu_t 1547 1 firewire_core
wmi 9049 1 mxm_wmi
uas 7775 0
usb_storage 45966 0
On 12/03/2011 02:10 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
What's your output for:
lsmod nvidia
---------------------------------------------
from twohot@device.mobile :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak<and...@pitonyak.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:57:16
To:<users@global.libreoffice.org>
Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video
driver
I was not aware of Leigh's advice until I saw your response here. So....
I found and followed his advice, and, I still see issues.
Note that I do still see the driver, however
>rpm -qa | grep -i nouveau
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-27.20110720gitb806e3f.fc16.x86_64
Then again, I also see all sorts of kmod stuff
>rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-290.10-1.fc16.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-3.1.2-1.fc16.x86_64-290.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64
nvidia-settings-1.0-13.fc16.x86_64
akmod-nvidia-290.10-1.fc16.1.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-290.10-1.fc16.x86_64
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-11.fc16.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64-290.06-1.fc16.2.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64-290.06-1.fc16.3.x86_64
On 12/02/2011 03:18 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
If you're running "kmod" nvidia drivers then you are not running nouveau.
Nouveau runs out-of-the-box (fresh installation) and has proven to be more headache-free.
I have not noticed this issue. Could this be peculiar to a file? Can you describe steps
to replicate it without transferring a sample file?
I am presently running nouveau with LO without issues on F16 but I probably haven't gone your
route. My experience with "kmod-nvidia" and the sister "akmod-nvidia" is that
they conflict with nouveau especially if nouveau is not silenced. Did U follow leigh's instructions
at forums.fedoraforum.org?
---------------------------------------------
from twohot@device.mobile :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Lozier<jsloz...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:11:58
To:<users@global.libreoffice.org>
Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Problem with Linux open nouveau video
driver
On 12/01/2011 10:16 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 12/01/2011 10:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/30/2011 05:04 PM, Jonathan Schultz wrote:
Hello,
For some time I've found that libreoffice (and openoffice before it)
had
trouble rendering text with the Linux open 'nouveau' (as opposed to the
proprietary NVIDIA) driver. What appears to happen is that everything
above a certain point is good, but below it the text simply doesn't
appear. I've not seen any other application that has the same problem.
I've attached a typical screenshot to demonstrate the effect.
It always helps if you: 1) tell others what version of LO you are having
issues with (and also if it is from LO or some other source; linux
distribution repository or PPA, etc), 2) what OS type and version
(there are about thousands of versions of linux). My /guess/ is that you
are running some form of Ubuntu, if correct please tell us which version
you are running.
Cannot comment on this poster, but, I have seen a very similar issue
on both OOo and LO. I see this on Linux, not on Windows. I had the
problem with Fedora 15 and also Fedora 16. Both are 64-bit versions. I
use the KMod drivers for NVidia installed from the repositories. I see
the issues with other applications as well, but the primary offenders
are OOo and QT.
Using Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10 base and derivatives (Pinguy and Mint),
both 64 bit, I have not seen this behavior. AFAIK the drivers were/are
ATI Radeon from the repository. The actual drivers were auto-installed
on installation and left unchanged. The desktops include both Gnome 2.?
and Gnome 3.2. It appears that the problem is limited to the NVidia drivers.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
