On 18/01/2012 at 17:12, mnatiello <mario.natie...@math.lth.se> wrote:
> If you don't know about a way to modify the default... should I file an > "enhancement request?" If it did work in the past version of OOo (as you said), you should file it as "regression", not "enhancement". Fortunately, regressions gets more developers attention than enhancements. I think that would be valuable to check previous versions of OOo as well. Did it work in 3.0.0, but not in (say) 3.1? Does changelog mention it? If changed behavior was introduced in OOo, chances are that LO developers don't know anything about it. In that case, perhaps it indeed is "enhancement" and not "regression". But please wait some time (I don't know, few days?) before posting it on bugzilla. Maybe someone will drop by and explain things a bit. You can also ask on developers mailing list before posting on bugzilla. Maybe it was changed on purpose? -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
