On 02/07/2012 05:05 PM, e-letter wrote:
On 07/02/2012, Pertti Rönnberg<p...@elisanet.fi> wrote:
After reading Dan’s “Chapter 8” I realized that LO-Base is The solution
when a database of medium size/complexity is needed, either using the
embedded HSQLDB or connecting to an external “real” database engine
(e.g. MySQL or SQLite). Very much like MSAccess but free – no costs.
In your experience, when is it better to use the embedded database
instead of a client-server database?
The idea behind client-server is that while one accesses a database and
that others may be accessing the same database. The DMS is "intelligent"
enough to process updates, etc. without causing problems. With Base, you
are using the Base as the client interface with "server" database.
Embedded database engines are better for stand alone applications. Often
they are easier to access, open and go, while a client-server database
will require more steps such as logging in for access.
I usually use Base as a front end to MariaDB because I prefer it over
the embedded engine as if MariaDB was actually embedded (yes it is more
work initially)
--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
