Readers, For those people that consider high quality software to be of highest priority, more important than new features, please help to perform quality assurance manual software tests.
There is a web page which describes manual testing: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Manual_Tests. Clearly, there are insufficient testers... Please also subscribe to the quality assurance mailing list: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa. There are many bugs that seem to occur after so-called "upgrade". People who make the effort to report bugs: please consider how important each bug is. If it is of major importance, the ability to remove the bug must become part of the quality assurance manual test, i.e. the software version is not passed as good quality until that bug is removed. Testing for the success in solving the bug needs to be approved by using 'litmus' (https://tcm.documentfoundation.org). So, the behaviour that caused the bug needs to be recorded and entered into litmus. This should prevent regression bugs and improve software quality in the long-term. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
