Good idea, but the relationships haven't changed from OO. The fields in the grid which have relationships are "supplier" and "Region" (both links into other tables by an identifier field). The former is displayed incorrectly in the grid, the latter correctly.
"Name" and "comments" are both displayed incorrectly in the grid but are simple text fields in the underlying table. These are both VARCHAR type, but so is "style" which is displayed correctly. The fields are displayed correctly in the subform fields: if you look at the "Wine Name" and "supplier" boxes there's an entry there. There would be one in the "comment"box, but that particular wine on show didn't have a comment. So there's no consistency in terms of relationships and linked tables or field types as to what's displayed correctly and what isn't. I know the theory reasonably well (though OO/LO might have a different view of relationships to, say, MS Access). ----- Peter -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Problems-importing-an-OO-database-into-LO-tp3890826p3892472.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
