On 02/06/2012 at 23:29, "webmaster-Kracked_P_P" <webmas...@krackedpress.com> wrote:
> The real big thing is how ready is this line to be used for business > users. During the 3.3.x and 3.4.x line crossover, you keep getting told > that this version is ready and that version is not. I think you are trying to find some universal criteria of "business-readiness", which simply does not exist. Let's say that LO 3.6.0 has some serious bug in one of Calc's economical functions. Does it make it not ready for business users? It depends. If you are copywriter, who runs Calc few times in a month just to sum some numbers, then you can freely start using 3.6.0. If your job involves stock market, then perhaps you will prefer to stay with earlier version and wait for 3.6.x with bug fixed to come out. For academic writers, virtually none of OOo/LO is ready for business user due to poor bibliography management implementation (although you can use some other bibliographic management software, e.g. Zotero or Mendeley, with success). There is no simple answer for that question. Perhaps most conservative users should stick with 3.x.6 releases - as latest in each line, they have lowest number of bugs. If you have time, you can check what bugs are know and what are fixed for each release. When there are no bugs known in procedures you are using, then perhaps you can mark that version as "ready for business users". -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted