Felmon, I find your attitude towards discussion worth a respect. I wish everyone would do as you do.
I think we agree in most of points. I would only like to comment this part: On 07/08/2012 at 18:58, Felmon Davis <dav...@union.edu> wrote: > > I find this an absurd criterion of proof. there are plenty of proofs > of things I do not understand, for instance in math physics or fluid > dynamics, but that doesn't imply they are not proofs! But, honestly, I fear that providing accurate explanation in English is beyond me at the moment. We would need to go into basics of methodology history and theories, as well as philosophical concepts behind them. After that, I think you could agree with me. But explaining is not only difficult for me, it would also be awfully off the list topic. Therefore, I hope you do agree that we should end this discussion here. -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
