Dan wrote:
T Hopkins wrote:
The ribbon interface is definitely MO's big vulnerability.
I would also argue that continuing development and promotion of Base is
important. In
particular, decreasing the accessibility curve and making the usefulness of
Base more
apparent to users.
Cheers, tod
Tod Hopkins Hillmann & Carr Inc. todhopkins-at-hillmanncarr.com
I agree. But where are the people who are willing to write the Base
Guide? This takes time. I have been
working on this project since OOo 2.0. (OK, I may be rather slow.) I just
completed a rewrite of chapter 2
this afternoon. Rewrites of Ch 3 & 4 should take less time. Furthermore, there
are very few volunteers to
review my work. Then they need to be proof read for grammar, spelling, etc.
--Dan
Addendum: The first four chapters for the Base Guide in draft form are
available at
http://www.odfauthors.org/openoffice.org/english/userguide3/db3/dbg3_draft.
These were written for OOo 3.3.0. For LO, chapter 1 has already been published.
--Dan
On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:
On 08/09/2012 02:43 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 08/08/12 22:26, T Hopkins wrote:
The difference in cost of the initial license, when considered from the full
deployment/productivity calculation of an IT manager, is often not the deciding
factor. The primary cost of changing software is not the license, but
installation, configuration, training, and lost productivity during conversion.
The total costs of all that would be FAR lower by converting from Office 2003 or
any of its predecessors to LO compared to converting to Office
2007/2010.....users
could at least get going almost immediately with LO whereas the new ribbon
seemed
to be almost unfathomable to a lot of people, so yes, going from one version of
MS
Office to a SIMILAR version (as in Office XP to Office 2003 or Office 2007 to
2010)
I agree. Going from a menu-based Office to a ribbon-based Office no, I don't
agree.
AFAIK, MSO 2007/2010 are the only major packages that use the ribbon interface.
All
other recent Windows software I have seen still uses the traditional menus.
IMHO most
users can adapt to a reasonable menu layout fairly quickly; it is more about
finding
how to access a command than fighting the interface and finding the command.
I would expect most users could "learn" the LO fairly quickly because it is same
familiar menu style interface they are using on most packages.
The total cost to install includes rolling out the software to the users. If a
company is not planning a major office suite roll out then converting to any
other
suite will not occur. The ideal time to convert an organization is when they are
planning to replace their current suite. Then the a comparison of all costs
makes
sense.
-- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
