So you're saying because everyone else you interact with does it wrong,
it should also be done wrong here. Allow me to remind you that two (or
50) wrongs don't make a right.
Why is it wrong? Refer to Brian Barker's post wherein he references an
RFC. I'd repost what he wrote but I've already deleted it.
For the record, I also hit Reply out of habit on this message, but I
LOOKED at what I was sending out, and redid it. No big deal. Certainly
not worth complaining about.
On 8/14/2012 2:50 AM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
På Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:12:33 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger
<flo...@documentfoundation.org>:
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to thank everyone for your feedback, and assure you
that I read every bit, even if I don't manage to reply to every
message in detail.
My offer stands valid, let's wait for some more feedback and some
more days, and then make a final decision.
My feedback is that I don't like the change at all.
Most of the mailing lists I subscribe to nowadays (~50 lists) are on
Yahoo or Google, and none of them behaves like this, with no Reply-To
field. They all have the standard Reply-To list field.
And so do the few non-Yahoo/Google lists. LO is now the only
exception, and I actually out of old habit replied to your post as I
always do to lists (and emails), before I noticed that I was writing
to your email instead of to the list.
Please switch back!
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
