On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 20:05 -0500, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> It is pretty rare for specifics of bugs to be entered on the Users
> list, where there might have a passing comment that a bug would be or
> had been filed. But often no additional details of the bug in the
> discussion. But, that said, the threads are pretty descriptive.
I'm sure.
> Being a new subscriber, maybe the Nabble web interface would be of use
> to efficiently identify substantive issues that may have associated
> bugs.
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Users-f1639498.html
I saw that, and I saw only Leif's bug linked there, in a monster thread
of vagueness. It is hard to justify dedicating the time to try to
reverse engineer people's names into bugzilla queries to dig out exactly
what bug they're talking about indirectly; and it's difficult to grok
the thread thus far. Better to ask for help - hence my request :-) so
here goes again:
If you have a bug that you're particularly concerned about having been
marked NEEDINFO / RESOLVED INVALID, can you mail me a link ?
At least - it doesn't seem a good use of my time, when I could be
fixing bugs, reviewing patches etc. - I was hoping that some volunteer
might help me by building a list of the specific issues; so I can trawl
through them and get down to the grist of the technical issues fast.
That of course, is an ask not -that- different from asking people to
check if their bugs are still relevant vs. the latest version.
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
