Hi :)+1 Regards fromTom :) --- On Fri, 17/8/12, Leif Lodahl <leiflod...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Leif Lodahl <leiflod...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Excuse me, but your opinion is simply unimportant. Start over and you can expect more of the same. To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Friday, 17 August, 2012, 12:35 Hi Michael and all, May I suggest that we try to close down the discussion and try to find an acceptable approach? I believe that Michaels earlier mail explained the context and (as I read it) also include a small *apologize*. I suggest that - we send a polite and excusing mail to all the involved bug submitters explaining the reason for the action taken and the flow behind the bug handling. Also explaining that we might have closed some issues that shouldn't have been closed - and that we are sorry about that. In such case ask the original submitter to reopen the issue. - we implement procedures in the future to avoid repetition of this misunderstanding - we all put this behind us and get to work ;-) Cheers, Leif 2012/8/17 Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com> > > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:00 -0800, Marc Grober wrote: > > The latest from Florian in misspelled CAPS (which now brings us to the > > fact that the devs have touched this bug some 8 times without ever > > bothering to actually read it) - Bravo Florian, we read you 5 by 5: > > I've read it a couple of times over the years - and concluded that > it's > a minefield: of licensing - bundling GPL pieces, of odd requests: > "please checkin this binary into your source code revision control", and > worse. > > It requires some real thought, research and unwinding to get it > right. > It is not a trivial matter of "just shove XYZ file into your > distribution" - while that may work, it is not a sustainable way to > develop software. > > Please don't think that because your bug is not commented on that > it is > not considered. In general I like to provide some positive input in bugs > rather than the above. As such, we need to find someone to do the hard > work to get the code provenance unwound, and grok the situation as to > what can be included and how. > > Since I don't have the time to do that now, and I know of no-one > that > does, it looks set to continue to remain open; at least until someone is > motivated to do the necessary work. It looks just like a lot of other > nice-to-have features we want but can't yet resource. > > All the best, > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > > -- > For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
