On 11/19/2012 12:58 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-11-19 12:43 PM, Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> wrote:
You can get the OOXML standard from
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm
Are you actually suggesting that this is either complete or accurate?
You can get the binary file format description from
http://www.microsoft.com/openspecifications/en/us/programs/osp/office-file-formats/default.aspx
Ditto... a 'description of a file format' doesn't equate to somethinhg
that can be used/relied upon to build something that accurately
renders and/or recreates said format.
The ECMA standard is available in MSO 2013 as "OOXML strict", but LO
fails to read it.
So, I've heard, does MSO...
The new OOXML works only with MSO 2013. So this is another time they
make their new version's OOXML not compatible with their previous
versions of MSO. 2010 cannot read the new 2013 version, 2007 cannot
read the one that came out with 2010. That is why I stick with .doc for
Word 97/2000/XP/2003. Then everyone I know that uses Word will be able
to use my files.
SO, it only makes sense that it will be a bit till LO gets the needed
import/export filters to work with this newest version of MSO. I wonder
if the format is actually finalized yet. Last I heard it was not, as
well as MSO 2013 was in beta testing.
MSO 2013 supports ODF 1.2.
Really? Have you tested this? How accurately does it render ODF 1.2
files created with LibO?
If an authority demands standards or even demands ODF, this can all be
fulfilled with MSO, no need to use LO.
Rotflmao!
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
