+1 El jue, 27-06-2013 a las 17:13 +0100, Tom Davies escribió: > Hi :) > There are certain names i keep noticing and saying thanks to but there are > quite a few others that i never notice despite them putting in tons of hard > work. > > > I usually try to delete most LibreOffice emails but quite a few slip through > but just did a quick search of your name and found you have been extremely > active since at least Jan 2012. So, well over a year without any thanks! > > > So a BIG THANKS from me!! :))) > > > I wonder if it might be good to make a wiki-page list of people we think are > owed a thanks. I think i would want to include people that i don't > personally get on with particularly well or even argue against a lot because > we have all made LibreOffice what it is today and that result is superb. > Other mailing lists, such as the devs and docs team have lists of their > contributors, or their top contributors but we don't have anything like it > yet. > > One reason i noticed this over-sight was the QA people wrote to me to ask how > to get more people interested in their competition and i really didn't have a > good answer. I don't think i have the type of influence they were looking > for. Quite the opposite in fact. However, they made just a couple more > posts to this list and that seems to have generated fantastic results. > > So, good work to all!! I hope you are having fun over there and maybe > considered trying out a few other teams too. Even if not then still many > thanks for your work on this list. > Many thanks and regards from > Tom :) > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Virgil Arrington <cuyfa...@hotmail.com> > >To: users@global.libreoffice.org > >Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2013, 1:45 > >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: any word about 4.0.4 portable coming > >out? > > > > > >This question makes me wonder, just why there are so many LO versions and > >frequent new releases. I can't keep up, and I find myself torn about > >upgrading. I want the latest and greatest, but I've had problems with newer > >versions resurrecting old bugs. > > > >I'm sure there's an overriding philosophy that has been adopted, but I > >wonder if we might be better served with fewer new releases. > > > >Apache seems to have taken quite the opposite approach with no new releases > >of AOO since its 3.4.1. Perhaps something somewhere between the two extremes > >might be nice. > > > >Virgil > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster > >Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:19 PM > >To: users@global.libreoffice.org > >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: any word about 4.0.4 portable coming > >out? > > > > > >Well, I do not really agree with the "bad deal". > > > >They need to spend their time "converting" the Windows version to the > >"portable" version. It takes some time. So they pick and choose which > >version they will send their time on. LO 3.6.7 comes out soon, but they > >will not make that version, since the 4.0.x line is out. When 4.1.x > >line comes out, they will be moving to that and not work any more on the > >previous line. > > > >Sure, there are other "portable" software groups, but I only have dealt > >with the PortableApps group, since TDF deals with them. If another > >group starts making a good version for LO, then maybe the Board might > >want to look at them as well. For me, I just go with the current > >version that TDF/LO are listing on the download pages. > > > >Why would you want to run a portable version of LO when you have one > >installed? > > > >As for versions that are optimized for slower systems, well anyone who > >can deal with the compile/make process from the source code to binaries, > >can do some basic optimizing to a specific system. Sometimes it take a > >lot more. Raspberry Pi developers have optimized LO to run better on > >their system than the "standard" 32-bit Debian install. > > > >If you really think that TDF should look at the other portable app > >groups, then you need to bring it up to one of the Board members - and > >off the User list. These types of discussions work best on the Discuss > >List or some other list instead of the User list. > > > > > >On 06/26/2013 06:52 PM, Pedro wrote: > >> Hi Tim, all > >> > >> In my opinion TDF got a bad deal with the PortableApps people... > >> > >> They only create the versions they feel like and they drop a branch the > >> minute a new release is out from a newer branch. Even worse: they don't > >> listen to requests (maybe they don't have the manpower but they aren't > >> interested in voluntaries either...). > >> > >> The guys at WinPenPack create a new portable versions at the same pace as > >> the regular LO. And they missed version 3.6.6 but listened to my request > >> on > >> their Forum. > >> > >> For someone working on QA it is essential to have the final version on > >> each > >> branch. WinPenPack has all of them. > >> > >> Another advantage is that you can run all versions simultaneously (if you > >> wish). The PortableApps version can not be executed while the installed > >> version is running (I can't remember if it even runs when another portable > >> version is running). > >> > >> Finally the WinPenPack binaries seem to be somewhat optimized because they > >> run faster on slow computers (like my netbook). > >> > >> Conclusion: I highly recommend X-LibreOffice ;) > >> > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/ > >> > >> BTW X-LibreOffice version 4.0.4 is available since June 19th... > >> > >> Just my 2 cents ;) > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/any-word-about-4-0-4-portable-coming-out-tp4063162p4063198.html > >> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > >Problems? > >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > >deleted > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > >Problems? > >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ > >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > >deleted > > > > > >
-- Atentamente, Jorge RodrÃguez -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
