Hi :) I think with Base it's better to stay with older branches. The 3.6.7 might be better. if the 4.0.3 works for you then stick with that.
Sadly there are still not many devs working on Base. It's not flashy enough! Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: "la10...@iperbole.bologna.it" <la10...@iperbole.bologna.it> >To: users@global.libreoffice.org >Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 10:31 >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3 > > >Unfortunately, the "3rd digit rule" doesn't work as goog as expected... > I use report builder in base, 4.0.3.3 version. Download 4.0.4 and >report builder no more works (crash in opening). > > thanks anyway for developers work, I remember this is a free sw, at the >end.... > > Federico Quadri > > Tom Davies <tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk> ha scritto: >> Hi :) >> That 3rd digit is roughly the equivalent of "Service pack". So >> usually the higher it is the more stable it is. Of course even just >> bug-patches and fixes can sometimes introduce unexpected problems >> that might not get caught by QA. >> >> The best answer, imo, is to keep a very stable version that you >> are happy enough with on all the machines you look after especially >> ones that have limited access or that you can't reach easily. Then >> on 1 machine find some way of being able to test-drive an occasional >> beta-test versions before it gets released. Preferably do about 1 >> per branch. The problem is that things you might care about deeply >> might not even be getting used by other people at all. So it's only >> you that might notice. So if you didn't test-drive then the problem >> might never be found. Also it's better to do your testing on a beta >> release rather than a full release because it's during the early >> beta stage that the most devs are the most focussed on the 1 single >> version and trying to solve the most problems quickly. Also it's >> when the fewest other people are making bug-reports. >> >> There are various ways you could make sure you have access to 1 >> version for use for work that has a dead-line and another version >> that you can just use to try things out and make sure it all works. >> >> Regards from >> Tom :) >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Amit Choudhary <contact.amit.choudhary.in...@gmail.com> >>> To: "users@global.libreoffice.org" <Users@global.libreoffice.org> >>> Sent: Friday, 26 July 2013, 3:35 >>> Subject: [libreoffice-users] 4.0.3 >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was using 4.0.2 and then I downloaded 4.0.3 but 4.0.3 is not >>> as stable as >>> 4.0.2. So, now I am downloading 4.0.4. >>> >>> I am more interested in stable and feature rich (optional) >>> software rather >>> than frequently released software. >>> >>> Stablility is very important because a non-stable software / software >>> having many bugs results in loss of time and frustartion. >>> >>> Amit >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >-- >To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org >Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
