You made a survey without a survey statistician on your team. Did you send out a request for such a person on the mailing lists to advise you before you put together the survey? Did you have a clear and concise question that you wanted to answer before you developed the survey questions? Did you run the questions by an aforementioned professional in the staff and check for confirmation bias? I am not a professional statistician, and that's just what I spotted. I have covered surveys as a journalist in my previous career, though. And I also am a veteran of setting up business projects. A survey statistician would have a lot more to say I am sure. And we're not even starting on the analysis. In fact, I'd throw out the analysis and the results and start anew. First off, define "users" (end users, evangelists, business users?) and state the overall purpose of your survey in a single question. I regret some of the tone of the previous e-mail (first e-mail prior to coffee), but there's nothing here to work with. You've got 300 self-selected users with at least two major questions in one survey that you did not break out by region, sex, profession. You want results, you need good data underneath.
On 11/12/2013 7:04 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:57:20 -0700, > John Meyer <johnme...@pueblocomputing.com> a écrit : > >> On 11/10/2013 11:46 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> As there were some exchanges about the survey here and as I >>> advertised it on this mailing list as well, I thought you might be >>> interested by my initial analysis: >>> http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/11/10/users-the-final-frontier/ >>> >>> Thank you for your participation! >>> >> >> >> 1. The survey seems to be a Self seLected Opinion Poll (SLOP), so I'm >> taking it with a grain of salt the size of the Sears Tower. There's >> no margin of error included in the poll either and based upon the >> sample as being from the mailing lists (where people are generally >> active anyway) I'd say it's fairly skewed. >> 2. The conclusions are generic, wishy-washy and are based on guesses >> and assumptions with no hard underlying data. How much in >> contributions has LibreOffice raised? Does that fit in with what the >> survey said? Where is the Quality Assurance in the web site? And why >> would an end user be interested in that? >> 3. User support and quality assurance do not require too much time or >> technical knowledge. Remind me not to hire you for either of those >> tasks in my business. Those are things that professional companies >> hire entire other companies to do. >> >> I'd give this project an F in a freshman statistics class, and would >> not base any strategy off of this "survey" >> > > Thanks John, I'll take it from your comment that > 1) you are either a survey professional and you only wait for the next > survey to contribute your time designing it > > and/or > > 2) you will contribute the costs of hiring a market research firm the > next time we need a survey. > > Allegedly, I and none of the other people who designed the survey are > professional survey designers. > > Best, > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
