Okay, I point out problems and you're response is "you don't like it you can run out your own survey" and then say I'm inaccurate without stating why I'm inaccurate with a solicitation for donations in the previous e-mail. Do you see the major issue here? Flies, honey, vinegar.
I don't know how your project works, but if you're not doing the proper work beforehand I don't know how it can work. Ask anybody who's run any successful project. Heck, even the leaders of failed projects can tell you. They probably have more information. First, you define your goals. Next you gather and prepare your resources. You do a test run, maybe more than one and hope you have enough time. You have people with specific knowledge critique and make adjustments. Finally you run the project, and afterwards you analyze and make improvements for the next time. Those principals apply whether you're running a for profit project or a non profit. And that would be the bare bones work if I was running a local project. You're going global, which involves understanding cultural differences as well. That is not the type of thing I would do with an ad hoc team with nobody who has any experience in what I was doing in the first place. Like I said, define the questions, gather the mailing list. And if you don't have access to anybody with experience in statistics, don't launch until you do. A badly done survey is worse than none at all. On 11/12/2013 7:38 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:29:47 -0700, > John Meyer <johnme...@pueblocomputing.com> a écrit : > >> You made a survey without a survey statistician on your team. Did you >> send out a request for such a person on the mailing lists to advise >> you before you put together the survey? Did you have a clear and >> concise question that you wanted to answer before you developed the >> survey questions? Did you run the questions by an aforementioned >> professional in the staff and check for confirmation bias? > > > No. And apparently you have little awareness of how our project works. > But you make a couple of valid points. > >> I am not a professional statistician, and that's just what I >> spotted. I have covered surveys as a journalist in my previous >> career, though. And I also am a veteran of setting up business >> projects. A survey statistician would have a lot more to say I am >> sure. And we're not even starting on the analysis. In fact, I'd >> throw out the analysis and the results and start anew. First off, >> define "users" (end users, evangelists, business users?) and state >> the overall purpose of your survey in a single question. >> I regret some of the tone of the previous e-mail (first e-mail prior >> to coffee), but there's nothing here to work with. You've got 300 >> self-selected users with at least two major questions in one survey >> that you did not break out by region, sex, profession. You want >> results, you need good data underneath. > > You know, aside being rather inaccurate, you're welcome to run another > survey. We're always looking for more volunteers. And I'm glad to help > you on this, so please go ahead. > > best, > > Charles. > > >> >> On 11/12/2013 7:04 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >>> Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:57:20 -0700, >>> John Meyer <johnme...@pueblocomputing.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> On 11/10/2013 11:46 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> As there were some exchanges about the survey here and as I >>>>> advertised it on this mailing list as well, I thought you might be >>>>> interested by my initial analysis: >>>>> http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/11/10/users-the-final-frontier/ >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your participation! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. The survey seems to be a Self seLected Opinion Poll (SLOP), so >>>> I'm taking it with a grain of salt the size of the Sears Tower. >>>> There's no margin of error included in the poll either and based >>>> upon the sample as being from the mailing lists (where people are >>>> generally active anyway) I'd say it's fairly skewed. >>>> 2. The conclusions are generic, wishy-washy and are based on >>>> guesses and assumptions with no hard underlying data. How much in >>>> contributions has LibreOffice raised? Does that fit in with what >>>> the survey said? Where is the Quality Assurance in the web site? >>>> And why would an end user be interested in that? >>>> 3. User support and quality assurance do not require too much >>>> time or technical knowledge. Remind me not to hire you for either >>>> of those tasks in my business. Those are things that professional >>>> companies hire entire other companies to do. >>>> >>>> I'd give this project an F in a freshman statistics class, and >>>> would not base any strategy off of this "survey" >>>> >>> >>> Thanks John, I'll take it from your comment that >>> 1) you are either a survey professional and you only wait for the >>> next survey to contribute your time designing it >>> >>> and/or >>> >>> 2) you will contribute the costs of hiring a market research firm >>> the next time we need a survey. >>> >>> Allegedly, I and none of the other people who designed the survey >>> are professional survey designers. >>> >>> Best, >>> >> >> > > > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
