On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 01:12:25 +0100, Alexander Wilms wrote > If you think that truly open standards are a better solution than > OOXML, then it'd be beneficial if you registered on the > standards.data.gov.uk page and commented. In 3 days, comments will > be closed.
Maybe i'm not going to make friends, but OOXML "strict" actually *is* an open standard. The real problem is, that MS-Office until 2013 was not capable of creating "strict" files, but wrote OOXML "transitional" instead (which may - and as a matter of fact always did - contain proprietary stuff). So almost all OOXML files out in the wild today are in fact not 'real' OOXML but just proprietary, legacy office formats encoded in an XML-structure. However, OOXML - without distinguishing between the two flavors - was advertised by MS as being 'open' and you shall blame them for this. Of course it was a marketing-move to ship Office for years with incomplete, de-facto proprietary export filter, while claiming to be open... But nevertheless OOXML in it's 'pure' form is an ISO certified open standard (and not even a bad one as far as i can tell), and for the sake of open formats: if we can't get rid of MS Office then we should at least promote the usage of OOXML "strict" whenever possible. I still believe that ODF is the better choice though, because of its longer history as open standard, and i would of course appreciate it if MS would include proper import and export filters (they already had very good support in Office 2010, sadly they did not include it in Office 2012 for Mac - the reasons for this being highly speculative IMHO). cu Stephan -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
