> Am 10.03.2016 um 10:45 schrieb William Hay <w....@ucl.ac.uk>: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:19:35AM +0000, sudha.penme...@wipro.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Is it possible to keep an old queue name (test.q) we have deleted already >> as an alias name for the newly created queue(prod.q). >> >> >> >> This way we could continue to work with old scripts. > Grid Engine doesn't have direct support for this AFAICT hHowever you can > rewrite > the requested queue from a JSV. Depending on where you put the jsv you might > have > to add a dummy test.q to convince grid engine to accept the queue.
BTW: This is something I wondered about. GridEngine will check whether the requests are allowed and known before and after the JSV is run. This leads to exactly the situation that a dummy queue is needed. Would there be any flaw if the internal check by GridEngine is done only after the JSV has run? This would allow the JSV to correct any mis-submission and/or pseudo/dummy/alias to be resolved, being it names of queues or complexes. -- Reuti
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@gridengine.org https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
