On 23.06.2016 08:00, Thibault Kruse wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Cédric Champeau
<[email protected]> wrote:
A strong -1 for both options. We already have 2 variants of Groovy today,
indy and non indy, and in practice *nobody uses the invokedynamic version*
because it's impractical to use. ...
Adding a new dimension, which is orthogonal to invokedynamic makes it even more
complicated.
How about dropping the indy version then, and instead offer a
statically compiled one?
actually, in the light of JDK9 we may drop the non-indy version....
unless we are happy with the callsite caching being purely reflection based
bye Jochen
