On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 18:44 +0200, Cédric Champeau wrote: > A strong -1 for both options. We already have 2 variants of Groovy > today, > indy and non indy, and in practice *nobody uses the invokedynamic > version* > because it's impractical to use. Typically projects depend on > `groovy.jar` > or `groovy-all.jar`, not their invokedynamic version. Adding a new > dimension, which is orthogonal to invokedynamic makes it even more > complicated. Don't forget that the Groovy compiler is also mixed in > its > runtime (which is a problem of its own). We should solve that first.
I only use the indy artefacts not the non-indy ones. > […] -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
