As with everyone else: option 3, or even just solving the Java9+ issue separate from 3.0 is much more important than JDK7.
Cheers, Simon On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Iván López <lopez.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also vote for Option 3. I think it is better to focus on JDK 9+ than in > JDK 7. > > Regards, Iván. > > -- > @ilopmar <http://www.twitter.com/ilopmar> > > On 13 June 2018 at 11:30, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 08:11 +0100, David Dawson wrote: >> > I would vote 2. >> > >> > Actually, i would vote 3) abandon 2.6 immediately. >> > >> >> I vote for Option 3, abandon 2.6 immediately. >> >> With so little resource, the Groovy project must focus on forward looking >> work, not backward looking stuff. JDK10 is whee the current action is, and >> where Groovy should be looking to be competitive. >> >> -- >> Russel. >> =========================================== >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 >> 41 Buckmaster Road >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=41+Buckmaster+Road&entry=gmail&source=g> >> m: +44 7770 465 077 >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk >> > >
