On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 14:53 -0400, Keith Suderman wrote: > > […] > How about an option #4. If you are planning to do one more release of 2.6.0 > anyway just drop the 'alpha' from the name and announce that it is the first > and last 2.6.x release expected. >
I think this would be a bad idea. We haven't had any beta releases, nor RC releases. To jump to a final release strikes me as failure of proper process. Also leaving 2.6.0-alpha-3 as the last 2.6 release clearly indicates it is a retired version series. It also leaves it open much better for someone to pick it up should they so wish. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
