If that were the case, I do not think the apachectl execution would even have gotten as far as line 99. Furthermore I hardly think "Illegal instruction" is a shell script error. It may however very well be an error issued by the VlApache20_32 module.
-ascs -----Original Message----- From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 9:45 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV the files with something funny - you're not editing the config on a windows PC with Notepad and then FTPing it to Linux, are you? Or editing with StarOffice? Or some other odd thing...?] --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
