Eh, no ssl on this server. The best way to test the mpm is under some load, at least. Otherwise, issues with it that don't present themselves under low load won't show. We actually test new technology on this server at night with the ability to switch back instantly if need be.
I'll check it out tonight I suppose. --Graham -----Original Message----- From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:25 am Size: 994 bytes To: users@httpd.apache.org Graham Frank wrote: > Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the > daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it > onto a mission critical web server. > > Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent > history. Perhaps your beta/test/staging server is a better choice? :) As Nick mentions, because of the way event is set up, you might have problems with ssl, so I'd avoid it until you have a chance to -thoroughly- check it out, and watch other users' feedback here and in the bugzilla forums. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
