On 10/19/06, Gregor Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/19/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's fine. But then you should post your best attempt at the proper
> config. Not some garbage you are guessing at that has no resemblance
> at all to the docs that you say you read. (I can't imagine how you
> could have read those docs and come up with the config you posted.)
I posted the "garbage" since I didn't want my post to blow up and bug the
members of this lis (I know that quite some guys dislike if somebody is
posting the complete configs).
The problem was not that the garbage was incomplete; the problem was
that the garbage did not in any way resemble the suggestions in the
docs. Nor did it in any way take into account the feedback that I
gave you two days ago:
<quote>
I'm not sure where you found this example. Certainly not in the official docs:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html#using
You need only one NameVirtualHost directive for each IP-address/port
combination. And you should not use hostnames in NameVirtualHost or
<VirtualHost>. In a simple case like yours, you should use
NameVirtualHost *:80
(once) and
<VirtualHost *:80>
for each virtual host. Then you have to make sure that what you are
typing in your browsers URL bar for the hostname exactly matches the
hostname specified in ServerName in each virtual host.
</quote>
So I don't personally see any point in providing you with further
help, since you've completely ignored the help I've given you.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
