>The libraries are a part of gcc, and there is a policy at my work that
>prevents compilers from being installed on production boxes. I might
>be able to get them to install gcc but remove the actually compiler
>executable, but I'm not sure and I wanted to figure out what the
>correct way to do this is so that gcc doesn't have to be installed.
We don't install the compilers on our boxes either, but libraries that are
needed are placed on the boxes we ship. Can't compile, but the compiled
code that needs a shared library gets the library it needs.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign
[So it's true, scythe matters. Willow 5/12/03] X Against
Visit - URL: http://vidiot.com/ / \ HTML Email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
