rel...@harte-hanks.com wrote:
Unfortunately no. You see FoxPro is an odd beast. It'll allow you to run
a script/program without the extension. So from within FoxPro you can
type "do c:\temp\appname" and it'll look for appname.prg, then
appname.app. So the developers who wrote these apps are requesting pages
like /cgi/login?foo=bar causing FoxPro to look for the login.prg or
login.app. So if I use a rewrite rule like that it'll break if the code
is a .prg instead of an .app and unfortunately they used both all over the
place. Ideally I would make the developers rework their apps but
unfortunately we've let the developers go and are maintaining the apps
with the understanding that they won't be modified.
Shot from the hip : wouldn't "content negociation" help in a case like
that ? I'm thinking vaguely of the mechanism that is normally used to
return a .html.en or .html.es or .html.fr etc...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
