There's some confusion here as to just what is problematic.  A
link-local address works just fine without a scope-id.  So those
suggesting a modification of the address need to ask, not "do you need
to use a link-local address," but, "do you need to specify a
scope-id?"  Because the address parsing objected to the scope-id, not
to the interface address.

I've been pondering this a bit, and I can't think of a reason why
HTTPD would need to deal with scope-id.

-- 
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   mw...@iupui.edu
Friends don't let friends publish revisable-form documents.

Attachment: pgpu7TQCSkZGo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to