I would vote to make it a module over a patch due to Brian Mearns making
a good point about it possibly not moving beyond the IEFT. At least a
modular design can just be dropped from the operation of the server
without having to remove code from the core of the project (and network
admins having upgrade etc).
From what has been stated in the whitepaper, it shows very good
positives with very few drawbacks. I can't believe it would be voted
against by the IEFT with the increases that have been stated. Plus,
using the application layer, the incorporation of the protocol can be
made painlessly (to the end user) by the browser and web server
companies/developers.
Dave
Nick Kew wrote:
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Does Apache intend to add support for Googles recently announced SPDY
protocol?
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
Patches welcome! Or in this case, maybe a module.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
