Hello Daniel, > There is a failonstatus parameter you can set for each > balancer member that will have mod_proxy_balancer mark the worker out of > service if that status code is found
I noticed that parameter and had considered it, but wasn't sure how apache would know to re-enable it. Thank you for clearing that up. I am using AJP exclusively to the balancer-members. Forgive my ignorance... but will apache still take action if a "failonstatus" is set (for example, to 503) if AJP is the communication medium to the balancer-member? I assume apache can deduce the HTTP status code regardless of the protocol used to the back-end server, but I dislike assumptions. :) Thanks. Kyle Harper This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS ยง 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
