You need to decide what options you want from Varnish or mod_proxy_balancer.
Both are different. Varnish is basically for cache and you will not achieve cache from mod_proxy_balancer. You can use mod_proxy_balancer for failover and then use Varnish for better performance/cache on both nodes. Do let me know what are your concerns and specifically what you are looking in them for. Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman Principal SCM Engineer Description: vopium_signature_logo Description: imagesCAV9FMB1 + 92 334 9771227 | Description: imagesCAXWPPLS kashif_r | w www.vopium.com <http://www.vopium.com/> From: Anurag Kapur [mailto:anuragka...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 4:01 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Software Load Balancers | mod_proxy_balancer and Varnish No, I am looking to pick one of mod_proxy_balancer or varnish and thus looking for pros and cons. Anurag On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Filipe Cifali <cifali.fil...@gmail.com> wrote: Ldirectord
<<image001.png>>
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image003.jpg>>
