Just writing again to see if anyone can provide me some more inputs?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Anurag Kapur <anuragka...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thank you for your response. > > I am not looking for caching/site acceleration capabilities. I am looking > at pure load balancing capabilities only. > > Are there any know pros/cons or limitations of mod_proxy_balancer and > varnish load balancing? Capabilities that the load balancer that I am > looking for are: > > 1. Must be able to sustain and be performant in high load and volume > conditions > 2. Should support session stickyness and possibly failover from on node to > another without the client requiring to submit the request again > 3. Easy to deploy and configure. Possibly - ability to add and remove > nodes from the load balanced farm on the fly > > Kind Regards > > Anurag Kapur > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:02 AM, <kashif.rah...@in.com> wrote: > >> You need to decide what options you want from Varnish or >> mod_proxy_balancer.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Both are different. Varnish is basically for cache and you will not >> achieve cache from mod_proxy_balancer. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> You can use mod_proxy_balancer for failover and then use Varnish for >> better performance/cache on both nodes.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Do let me know what are your concerns and specifically what you are >> looking in them for.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thank you,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Best Regards,**** >> >> * >> Kashif Rahman* >> >> Principal SCM Engineer**** >> >> [image: Description: vopium_signature_logo]**** >> >> * * >> >> [image: Description: imagesCAV9FMB1] + 92 334 9771227 | [image: >> Description: imagesCAXWPPLS] kashif_r | *w* www.vopium.com**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Anurag Kapur [mailto:anuragka...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2012 4:01 AM >> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] Software Load Balancers | >> mod_proxy_balancer and Varnish**** >> >> ** ** >> >> No, I am looking to pick one of mod_proxy_balancer or varnish and thus >> looking for pros and cons.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Anurag >> >> **** >> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Filipe Cifali <cifali.fil...@gmail.com> >> wrote:**** >> >> Ldirectord**** >> >> ** ** >> > >
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image003.jpg>>
<<image001.png>>
