At this point nGinx, HAProxy, Lighthttpd seemed ~equivalent in speed. Apache was slower however, read repose to Jim's comment and questions ....
Apache Nginx HAProxy Lighttpd Alter Ratio of Traffic to Hosts Yes Yes Yes ? Send to 2 Hosts Yes Yes Yes Yes Implement Persistent Connection Yes Paid Only Yes Not Working Handle HTTPS Connection Yes Yes Yes Yes Terminate SSL at Load Balancer Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass thru SSL Connection Yes Yes Yes Yes Fail2Ban Compatibility Yes Yes Yes Yes Pass X-Forwarded-For Value Yes Yes Yes ? ________________________________ From: knobis...@gmail.com <knobis...@gmail.com> on behalf of Martin Knoblauch <kn...@knobisoft.de> Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 9:27:47 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache load balancer, etc Hi John, care to share pointers to those comparisons? Curious myself ... Thanks Martin On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Rose, John B <jbr...@utk.edu<mailto:jbr...@utk.edu>> wrote: Have been comparing Apache load balancing with some other possibilities As expected can do just about anything you want with Apache but the performance testing between Apache load balancing and nginx, haproxy, lighthttpd has Apache noticeably slower. Any tips on config tuning to optimize Apache load balancing performance? Any comments on open source software load balancers you folks have used that you recommend? Thanks Sent from my iPad --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org<mailto:users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org<mailto:users-h...@httpd.apache.org> -- ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de
