Hello, Perhaps the dev list is a more appropriate place to bring this up. Cheers
El mar, 22 nov 2022 a las 9:39, Codeweavers (<apache-l...@codeweavers.net>) escribió: > Hey Daniel, > > Would you be able to advise how I might push to get this change into > 2.4.55? Or if there is someone I should be asking? > > Kind regards > > Ben > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 at 08:56, Codeweavers <apache-l...@codeweavers.net> > wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> We initially had trouble as this patch seems from our testing to require >> the timeout value set on the BalancerMember line of the configuration, >> which to us was not immediately obvious (many parts of the configuration >> seem to take a timeout that from the documents seem like it would >> represent the same setting), though looking at the code that is patched and >> the documentation I can see that the BalancerMember lines do represent >> workers which I presume corresponds with the worker object code looks to be >> pulling the value from. >> >> Kind regards >> >> Ben >> >> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 18:35, Daniel Ferradal <dferra...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I initially reported this in April 2021 and @Yann Ylavic quickly made a >>> patch out of it. I am not sure why it didn't make it. >>> >>> You can see the conversation here for reference: >>> >>> https://httpd.markmail.org/message/xteh3uw53inl25gx?q=mod_proxy_hcheck+response+timeout%3F >>> >>> I also agree it is a good patch and although I initially had issues with >>> it it was probably due to some problem on my part. >>> >>> Your confirmation may be good enough to validate it and propose it for >>> next release perhaps? >>> >>> Thanks for bringing this back. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> El jue, 17 nov 2022 a las 17:26, Benjamin Davis (< >>> benjaminda...@codeweavers.net>) escribió: >>> >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>> we have apache2 2.4.54 setup as a load balancer for our IIS backend >>>> servers. We would like to be able to carry out health checks using >>>> mod_proxy_hcheck and check that the backend server is serving a webpage. We >>>> have successfully set this up however in the event that a health check >>>> request to the backend hangs, apache never reaches a timeout and therefore >>>> the healthcheck doesn't fail. >>>> >>>> We have found a commit >>>> https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/ab2b9dbfb74049ad207a91c45971948127dde893 >>>> that >>>> fixes this issue, we have verified this by building apache with this change >>>> applied and confirmed that when a timeout is provided in the apache >>>> balancer configuration, specifically on the BalancerMember line, the >>>> healthcheck(s) will timeout and put the backend into a failed state. >>>> >>>> This code is not in the latest apache release, does anyone have any >>>> idea if this will be part of a future release? Or can advise regarding this >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> Many thanks >>>> >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Ben Davis >>>> >>>> Infrastructure Engineer >>>> >>>> >>>> Website: www.codeweavers.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Barn 4, Dunston Business Village, ST18 9AB. Registered in England and >>>> Wales >>>> >>>> No. 04092394 VAT registration no. 974 9705 63 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Ferradal >>> HTTPD Project >>> #httpd help at Libera.Chat >>> >> > > -- Daniel Ferradal HTTPD Project #httpd help at Libera.Chat