If Martin's suggestion of using CSS doesn't sort the issue, then I guess the fix will need to be a little deeper.... perhaps using some other Wicket API other than setDisabled(...). Maybe something like using an AttributeModifier to put the "readOnly" attribute on instead, cf http://stackoverflow.com/a/10282380/56880
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 at 13:51 Erik de Hair <e.deh...@pocos.nl> wrote: > > On 11/30/2016 01:22 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > > oops. I meant https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1547 > > Thanks Dan > > > > > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 at 12:20 Dan Haywood <d...@haywood-associates.co.uk> > > wrote: > > > >> Thanks both. I've created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1546 > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 at 11:35 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I guess the "disabled" attribute comes from Wicket. > >> If a FormComponent is setEnabled(false) then Wicket will set this > attribute > >> to the HTML form element (input. textarea, etc.). > >> IMO the correct solution is to override the CSS rule that disables the > >> selection of the text. > >> > >> Play with > >> > >> -webkit-user-select: none; > >> -moz-user-select: none; > >> -ms-user-select: none; > >> user-select: none; > >> > >> Just change the value. > >> > >> Martin Grigorov > >> Wicket Training and Consulting > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Dan Haywood < > >> d...@haywood-associates.co.uk> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> If you are certain that using 'readonly' would do the trick, then > please > >>> raise a ticket for that. > >>> Thx > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 at 09:44 Erik de Hair <e.deh...@pocos.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I believe it was mentioned once in another thread that selecting text > >>>> (and so copying) from a disabled field doesn't work in Firefox on > >>>> Windows. Since a week or two it's not possible on a lot of Chrome > >>>> installations of our users either, probably due to a Chrome update. > >> This > >>>> really is a big problem for our users because we share a lot of > >>>> configuration data for internet access and telephony services and > >>>> copying data makes sure they don't make mistakes while configuring > >> their > >>>> systems. > >>>> > >>>> Would it be a problem to use the read only attribute instead of the > >>>> disabled attribute? That would be an easy fix. > >>>> > >>>> Anybody experiencing the same issue and having a nice solution? > >>>> > >>>> Erik > >>>> > >> > >
