Hi Jean-Luc Just a clarification:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Bouchet Jean-Luc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But to use it in an industrial context we need better connexion pooling and > above all better cluster implementation ! (Jackrabbit doesn't really work in > active/active mode with load balancing) By stating the above about clustering implementation, are you referring to your (unanswered) post [1]? [1] http://markmail.org/message/p5grokdutnymaj72 @Users: Could we somehow follow-up on this post and see if we have a workaround for the caching problem, or qualify a bug for Jacrkabbit? I think it is important to understand how to deal with such practical problems for the clustering feature. Cheers Greg -- -- Greg Klebus | http://day.com | http://dev.day.com -- Best open-source JCR repository: http://jacrkabbit.apache.org -- ** Day JCR Cup 08** | Win a MacBook Pro: http://dev.day.com
