Hi Greg Yes, I refer to it. We're waiting for JackRabbit 1.5 for connection pooling (unfortunately not enough time to do this on our own) in order to have better scalability, and we probably use it in active/passive cluster configuration (the asynchronous mechanism will work for "passive" cluster cache).
JL -----Message d'origine----- De : Greg Klebus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 14 avril 2008 10:59 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: RE : Use Jackrabbit as WebDAV-Server Hi Jean-Luc Just a clarification: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Bouchet Jean-Luc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But to use it in an industrial context we need better connexion > pooling and above all better cluster implementation ! (Jackrabbit > doesn't really work in active/active mode with load balancing) By stating the above about clustering implementation, are you referring to your (unanswered) post [1]? [1] http://markmail.org/message/p5grokdutnymaj72 @Users: Could we somehow follow-up on this post and see if we have a workaround for the caching problem, or qualify a bug for Jacrkabbit? I think it is important to understand how to deal with such practical problems for the clustering feature. Cheers Greg -- -- Greg Klebus | http://day.com | http://dev.day.com -- Best open-source JCR repository: http://jacrkabbit.apache.org -- ** Day JCR Cup 08** | Win a MacBook Pro: http://dev.day.com
