Hi Marcel, Thanks for your time first, Marcel Reutegger wrote: > > > I'm not sure I understand your use case. What exactly do you mean with > 'query > posts by a tag'? If you know the tag you can simply traverse the tree and > collect the paths that reference the entries. but I guess that's not what > you > want... > Yes, traverse the tree and collect desired node is a possible way. I just want to know how to got post by tag ( ex tag have value 'xxx'), but as i know so far, current Jackrabbit (1.4.6) doesn't support query xpath with fn:name() or local-name() ... so traverse the tree is unique way to get post by tag. I don't know traverse the tree leads to some perfomance issues or not ( i'm not sure). Could you give me a hint?
Marcel Reutegger wrote: > >> + (jcrom users): Suppose I get all tags by their property name. Because I >> allow query on partial property name (ex. x instead of xxx), I can't find >> a >> smart way to get property values. >> + Is there other way to organize a similar structure to easily query ? > > as an alternative you may want to consider reversing the references. let > the > entries reference the tags. maybe that makes it easier for your to > formulate the entries > Yes, we could refer tag from the post (entry) but I want tag to know post because tag could be used for tagging photo or article... It's also design issue, I want to isolate tag module. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Xpath-query-based-on-dynamic-property-name-tp20126431p20149365.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
