iapilgrim wrote: > Yes, traverse the tree and collect desired node is a possible way. I just > want to know how to got post by tag ( ex tag have value 'xxx'), but as i > know so far, current Jackrabbit (1.4.6) doesn't support query xpath with > fn:name() or local-name() ... so traverse the tree is unique way to get post > by tag. I don't know traverse the tree leads to some perfomance issues or > not ( i'm not sure). Could you give me a hint?
dereferencing a list of paths is certainly not more expensive than executing a query that would return the same result. regards marcel
