Can a SPARQL endpoint return data in JSON-LD format?

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 22/01/14 20:52, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>
>> I know it's been discussed before, since I think I was the last one
>> (or one of the last) to bring it up. :-)
>>
>> To search the archives, try using Gmane.org.
>> http://dir.gmane.org/search.php?match=jena
>>
>> But the short version, as I understand it, is that Jena JSONLD support
>> is here:  https://github.com/afs/jena-jsonld
>>
>> I don't actually know enough about the history and the project
>> internals to know why it's separate or if there are plans to pull it
>> into main Jena or not, but there is support there and usable.  We use
>> it in a couple of our projects and it works fine.
>>
>
> Because I haven't moved it into Jena proper yet :-)  You may notice there
> was a small amount of activity a few days ago - clearing up prior to moving
> to RIOT.  It's just a small matter of finding the time.  Then it'll will be
> in the main build.
>
> The real work is done by https://github.com/jsonld-java/jsonld-java(which 
> only depends on other Apache Licensed dependencies). I was waiting
> for jsonld-java to go to v0.3 but I'll move the code in depending on v0.2
> and switch when they release 0.3.
>
>         Andy
>
>
>  Phil
>> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Samuel Padgett <spadg...@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> JSON-LD is now a W3C Recommendation [1]. Has JSON-LD been considered for
>>> Jena? I was curious if it was in the roadmap or if there are no plans for
>>> support. It would be nice if JSON-LD were supported natively.
>>>
>>> I searched the JIRA issues for Jena and didn't find anything. (Apologies
>>> if
>>> this has been discussed on the mailing list before... I couldn't find an
>>> obvious way to search the archives.)
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/
>>> --
>>> Samuel Padgett | IBM Rational | spadg...@us.ibm.com
>>> Eclipse Lyo: Enabling tool integration with OSLC
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to