I am sorry, in theory I know most of things, but when it come to coding, I
> make mistakes.
>
> I know Literal can be any string or integer value and resources are what we
> used in our ontology (some things).
>
> Object of property FavioriteLeague is a resource : FACup, in this case,
> whose URI is
>
>
>
> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavioriteLeague>FACup or
> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#ChampLeague etc
More important, the object of triples with the predicate rdf:type is
either a URI u or a blank node b, i.e.
An RDF triple is basically defined as (old definition, RDF 1.1 is based
on IRIs)
t = U ∪B x U x U ∪B ∪L
and for rdf:type triples we only have
t = U∪B x rdf:type x U∪B
with U being the set of URIs, B the set of blank node and L the set of
literals.
By the way, I don't know if "Faviorite" is correct in your language, but
for me it looks like a typo. At least it doesn't look like proper
English - favorite (US) or favourite is how I would write it
> Thank you
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Lorenz B. <
> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>
>>> How should I share the ontology, the attachment is not allowed here?
>>>
>>> I used this to execute the rule
>>>
>>> for (Iterator i = inf.listResourcesWithProperty(RDF.type,
>>> favioriteleague); i.hasNext();)
>>> {
>>> inf.listStatements(null,RDF.type, "FavioriteLeague");
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> I think the problem is here in the code.
>> I don't know how often we told you that RDF resources are identified by
>> URIs...
>> Your class is
>>
>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>
>> and you use a literal
>>
>> "FavioriteLeague"
>>
>> in the code when you write
>>
>> inf.listStatements(null,RDF.type, "FavioriteLeague");
>>
>> Please please read an RDF tutorial for the beginning. Please make sure
>> that you understand the difference between literals and resources in RDF.
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Lorenz B. <
>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you please share the whole ontology with us?
>>>> And the snippet of code that loads + executes the rule.
>>>>> *FACup* here is the resource in my ontology
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:40 PM, neha gupta <neha.bang...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Lorenz, what actually I did is created a data property in Protege :
>>>>>> "FavioriteLeague".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I wrote this rule:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (?x http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team) "
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + "( ?x http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals ?goals )" +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "greaterThan(?goals,30)
>>>>>> + " -> (?x http://www.semanticweb.org/
>> soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup )]";
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Lorenz Buehmann
>>>> <buehm...@informatik.uni-
>>>>>> leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry to say that, but with that one line of code I cannot help you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not clear how you use the property. And as always, the correct
>> URI
>>>>>>> matters. If you have somewhere in the code a small type, then it will
>>>>>>> create a different property. And if that property is not typed as OWL
>>>>>>> data property, it will be an RDF property. OWL API and thus Protege
>>>> will
>>>>>>> render this then as OWL annotation property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10.01.2017 12:49, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>> The data is stored in RDF/XML
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> model.write(writer, "RDF/XML");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All other properties works fine and stored as data property but just
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> one property is stored in Annotation area.
>>>>>>>> Some weeks ago, I face the same problem but then it was fixed by
>>>> random
>>>>>>>> changes to code. I dont know in which situation this problem comes?
>>>>>>>> I did not show the code because one type of code depends on other
>> and
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> will not be able to understand it easily.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Lorenz Buehmann <
>>>>>>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're missing again all necessary information...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You don't show use the code and the data. What is the ontology? In
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>> format do you save it and how? What do you expect from us with no
>>>>>>>>> information like that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't see the problem so far.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You load an OWL ontology that has the data property declarations,
>> and
>>>>>>>>> later on you write the same model to disk. Nothing will be
>> converted
>>>>>>>>> into an annotation property then.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09.01.2017 22:17, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>> I have a rule like this
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If a team Goal>30 in a League (PremLeague, ChampLeague etc) then
>> it
>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> team FavioriteLeague.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FavioriteLeague is a data property to which teams will be assigned
>>>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>>>>> rules. But the problem here in my case is when I run the program,
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> FavioriteLeague property is saved in the "Annotations" section,
>> near
>>>>>>>>>> rdfs:comment and label. Also I see ManchesterCity
>> FavioriteCategory
>>>>>>>>>> PremLeague in Annotation section.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why this stored there and not as Data property of the team.?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lorenz Bühmann
>>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>> Lorenz Bühmann
>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>
>>
--
Lorenz Bühmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
