I don't understand your problem now, sorry. It's too confusing.

You said that you changed the whole ontology: upload it somewhere such
that we can see it

Show the final rule that doesn't work, not in pseudo-syntax but how you
use it in Jena.

Upload the code somewhere

> I am sorry for any inconvenience I have created. I really dont know how to
> create minimal code snippet or uses Github.
>
> Coming to the problem, what I noticed is the problem is in the object i-e
> FACup here.
> team1  FavoriteLeague  FACup
>
> Because I made changes and coming to the down, used different properties
> (in place of  FavoriteLeague), and made the rule simple to:
> If x is a Team, then x FavoriteLeague is FACup ,
> If x is a Team, then x Wins is FACup etc just for simplicity.
>
> In a nutshell, changed everything except object of rule FACup and it
> appears in Annotation area so the problem for sure is in the URI of FACup.
>
> Now about resources FACup, PremierLeague, ChampionsLeague, these are not
> associated with anything in the ontology (neither Types of anything, nor
> data/object assertions), rather I just created it in Protege with URI like
> other resources.
> URI of Team Class: http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team
> URI of FavoriteCategory : http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavoriteCategory
> and URI of FACup: http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup
>
> So I dont know if it is mandatory to get the value of resource
> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup first before the rules executes
> because simple putting it in the rules not working for me.
>
> Sorry once again.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Lorenz B. <
> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>
>> in your last answer you wrote
>>
>> *String ns="http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer
>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals>#";*
>>
>> if you provide us no information and the information that you provide is
>> of such poor quality, then it's not possible to help you.
>>
>> Last time that I'll write this here:
>>
>> 1. provide the WHOLE ontology (there are many services only where you
>> can put your file online for free)
>> 2. show the minimal code snippet that makes it possible to see that it
>> doesn't work
>>
>> Or put everything into a Github project
>>
>>
>>> Hi Lorenz, the ns is wrong, how?
>>>
>>> String ns="http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
>>>
>>> Rule:
>>>
>>> (?x http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://
>>> www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team) "
>>>
>>>  + "( ?x http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals  ?goals )" +
>>>
>>>         "greaterThan(?goals,30)
>>>          + " ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup  )]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Lorenz Buehmann <
>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11.01.2017 22:10, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>> Hello Lorenz, I am sure I have used the FavoriteLeague as Data Property
>>>> in
>>>>> Protege and it has the same URI as other data properties and other
>>>>> resources in the ontology ie  http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
>>>>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals>FavoriteLeague.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have changed the spelling of FavoriteLeague. to FavoLeague,
>> favLeague,
>>>>> but every time the same disappointing result.
>>>>> My namespace is also same in whole program:
>>>>>
>>>>> *String ns="http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer
>>>>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals>#";*
>>>> Ehm that's a totally wrong namespace declaration. To be honest, I don't
>>>> understand why you don't see this...and the namespace in the rule is
>>>> obviously NOT the same then
>>>>> favleague is declared as:
>>>>>
>>>>>  *OntProperty favleague=model.getOntProperty(ns+ "FavoriteLeague");*
>>>> Please tell me, what do you think is the concatenation of the String in
>>>> the variable ns and the String "FavoriteLeague" ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> //All my data properties are declared like this and it works.  For ex:
>>>> Goal
>>>>> property
>>>>> OntProperty goals=model.getOntProperty(ns+ "Goals");
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Lorenz Buehmann <
>>>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris is right. It's beginning to become annoying if youalways ignore
>>>>>> our advices to show data + the code - all the code. Even now you
>> omitted
>>>>>> information like
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * the declaration of the variable ns
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * the declaration of the variable favcat
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And indeed the data. IF you have anywhere in the code and/or data a
>>>>>> typo, the rule not "fire", thus no data will be inferred. In your
>> case,
>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that data is inferred (you said that Protege shows it
>> as
>>>>>> annotation) - but the inferred property is nowhere declared as
>>>>>> owl:DatatypeProperty in the ontology. This is mandotory for OWL/OWL
>>>>>> API/Protege
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11.01.2017 16:48, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>> I used like this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  *OntProperty favleague=model.getOntProperty(ns+
>> "FavioriteLeague");*
>>>>>>> Then I wrote this rule:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (?x http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
>>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team) "
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  + "( ?x http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals  ?goals )" +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         "greaterThan(?goals,30)
>>>>>>>          + " ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/
>>>> soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup  )]";
>>>>>>> //FACupe is resource in the ontology:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then
>>>>>>>   *inf.listStatements(null,favcat,(RDFNode)null);*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the problem is not in typo because I run similar rule for
>>>> another
>>>>>>> data property FavioriteStadium and it also saves in Annotation area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Chris Dollin <
>>>>>> chris.dol...@epimorphics.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/01/17 15:15, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even this not works
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  inf.listStatements(null,favleague,(RDFNode)null);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gives the result but in Annotation area of Protege
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> COMPLETE MINIMAL EXAMPLE, please. You have so many
>>>>>>>> errors & omissions in the code you show us we can't
>>>>>>>> tell which one is the one you're asking about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If Protege is putting things in the annotation area
>>>>>>>> I'd guess that means the thing isn't declared as either
>>>>>>>> a DataProperty or an ObjectProperty. Given your erratic
>>>>>>>> spelling that's quite likely.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> "He could not weigh up which was worse and so tried not to think
>> about
>>>>>>>> either."
>>>>>>>>                                                 /The Spellgrinder's
>>>>>>>> Apprentice/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com
>>>>>>>> Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead,
>> Bristol
>>>>>> BS20
>>>>>>>> 6PT
>>>>>>>> Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number
>>>>>>>> 7016688)
>>>>>>>>
>> --
>> Lorenz Bühmann
>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>
>>
-- 
Lorenz Bühmann
AKSW group, University of Leipzig
Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center

Reply via email to