Hi, My 2 Cents :
The reason I proposed to have separate modules for Lucene, Solr and ES is exactly for avoiding the "All or Nothing" approach we need to take if we club them all together. If they stay together and if in the near future I want to upgrade ES to another version, I also need to again upgrade Lucene and Solr and possibly another implementation that may have been added during the time. As we all know, this means weeks of work if not months to get the changes released. This will personally de-motivate me to do anything and I will probably start maintaining my version of Jena-Text as that would be much simpler to do than to upgrade and test and in the process own(read fix bugs) the upgrade for each and every technology. If they are developed as separate modules, they can evolve independently of each other and we can avoid situations where we cant upgrade to latest version of Lucene because we do not know what effect it will have on Solr Implementation. We can start with having a separate Module for Jena Text ES and see how things go. If they go well, we could extract out Solr and Lucene out of Jena Text. Again this is just a suggestion based on my limited industry experience. Thanks, Anuj Kumar On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Osma Suominen <osma.suomi...@helsinki.fi> wrote: > 28.02.2017, 17:12, A. Soroka kirjoitti: > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dce0d502b11891c28e57bbc >> bb0cdef27d8374d58d9634076b8ef4cd7@1431107516@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E >> ? In other words, might it be better to factor out between -text and >> -spatial and _then_ try to upgrade the Lucene version? >> > > I certainly wouldn't object to that, but somebody has to volunteer to do > the actual work! > > I don't use the Solr component now, but I could easily see so doing... >> that's pretty vague, I know, and I'm not in a position to do any work to >> maintain it, so consider that just a very small and blurry data point. :) >> > > Last time I tried it (it was a while ago) I couldn't figure out how to get > it running... If you could just try that with some toy data, then your data > point would be a lot less blurry :) I haven't used Solr for anything, so > I'm not very familiar with how to set it up, and the jena-text instructions > are pretty vague unfortunately. > > > -Osma > > > -- > Osma Suominen > D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist > National Library of Finland > P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) > 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO > Tel. +358 50 3199529 > osma.suomi...@helsinki.fi > http://www.nationallibrary.fi > -- *Anuj Kumar*
