that did the trick Andy, very good might be a good idea to add this to the
distribution in jena-log4j.properties

I am getting these numbers for a midsize dedicated server, very nice
numbers indeed Andy. well done!

00:24:53 INFO  loader               :: Loader = LoaderPhased
00:24:53 INFO  loader               :: Start:
../../public_html/lotico.ttl.gz
00:24:55 INFO  loader               :: Add: 500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
237,755 / Avg: 237,755)
00:24:56 INFO  loader               :: Add: 1,000,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
305,250 / Avg: 267,308)
00:24:58 INFO  loader               :: Add: 1,500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
313,087 / Avg: 281,004)
00:25:00 INFO  loader               :: Add: 2,000,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
328,299 / Avg: 291,502)
00:25:01 INFO  loader               :: Add: 2,500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
341,763 / Avg: 300,336)
00:25:03 INFO  loader               :: Add: 3,000,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
337,381 / Avg: 305,935)
00:25:04 INFO  loader               :: Add: 3,500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
318,877 / Avg: 307,719)
00:25:06 INFO  loader               :: Add: 4,000,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
295,857 / Avg: 306,184)
00:25:07 INFO  loader               :: Add: 4,500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
327,225 / Avg: 308,388)
00:25:09 INFO  loader               :: Add: 5,000,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
349,406 / Avg: 312,051)
00:25:09 INFO  loader               ::   Elapsed: 16.02 seconds [2019/06/15
00:25:09 CEST]
00:25:11 INFO  loader               :: Add: 5,500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
285,062 / Avg: 309,388)
00:25:13 INFO  loader               :: Add: 6,000,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
203,665 / Avg: 296,559)
00:25:16 INFO  loader               :: Add: 6,500,000 lotico.ttl.gz (Batch:
189,393 / Avg: 284,190)

on another machine that sits in the Azure infrastructure somewhere it
tdbloader doesn't look as good, even with decent hardware it seems to die a
slow death of memory exhaustion at 16GB. started off with 70kT/s and is now
down to 17kT/s and still going.

lesson learned big iron and big memory is the way to go with Jena
tdbloaders.




On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:53 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> These messages are logged (to logger "org.apache.jena.tdb2.loader") - do
> you have log4j.proprties in the current working directory?
>
> Do you get any output?
>
> INFO  Loader = LoaderParallel
> INFO  Start: /home/afs/Datasets/BSBM/bsbm-5m.nt.gz
> INFO  Add: 500,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 134,770 / Avg: 134,770)
> INFO  Add: 1,000,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 189,753 / Avg: 157,604)
> INFO  Add: 1,500,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 205,676 / Avg: 170,920)
> INFO  Add: 2,000,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 204,248 / Avg: 178,189)
> INFO  Add: 2,500,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 202,101 / Avg: 182,508)
> INFO  Add: 3,000,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 206,953 / Avg: 186,173)
> INFO  Add: 3,500,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 183,621 / Avg: 185,804)
> INFO  Add: 4,000,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 151,423 / Avg: 180,676)
> INFO  Add: 4,500,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 152,765 / Avg: 177,081)
> INFO  Add: 5,000,000 bsbm-5m.nt.gz (Batch: 158,881 / Avg: 175,076)
> INFO    Elapsed: 28.56 seconds [2019/06/14 22:51:37 BST]
> INFO  Finished: /home/afs/Datasets/BSBM/bsbm-5m.nt.gz: 5,000,599 tuples
> in 28.63s (Avg: 174,644)
> INFO  Finish - index SPO
> INFO  Finish - index POS
> INFO  Finish - index OSP
> INFO  Time = 35.572 seconds : Triples = 5,000,599 : Rate = 140,577 /s
>
>
> There is pause after the first "Finished:" - this is finished data in,
> the index threads are still running and the pause comes from flush to disk.
>
>      Andy
>
> On 14/06/2019 20:16, Marco Neumann wrote:
> > let me fire up one of the big machines to see what I will get there.
> > currently I have no info display during load with tdb2.tdbloader . if -v
> is
> > specified I get some extra info but no load info.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 8:03 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14/06/2019 18:13, Marco Neumann wrote:
> >>> I am collecting jena loader benchmarks. if you have results please post
> >>> them directly.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.lotico.com/index.php/JENA_Loader_Benchmarks
> >>
> >> tdb2.tdbloader has variations controlled by --loader.
> >>
> >> --loader=
> >> Loader to use: 'basic', 'phased' (default), 'sequential', 'parallel' or
> >> 'light'
> >>
> >> "basic" is a super naive parser-add triple loop - it used if a loader
> >> can't cope with an already loaded database.
> >>
> >> "phased" is a balanced, does not saturate the machine loader. Some
> >> parallelism.
> >>
> >> "sequential" is the tdbloader algorithm for TDB2, more for reference.
> >>
> >> "parallel" is as much parallelism as it wants. (5 for triples, more for
> >> quads)
> >>
> >> "light" is two threaded. Slightly ligther than "phased".
> >>
> >> See LoaderPlans.
> >>
> >>> On a linux machine I am using "time" to collect data.
> >>>
> >>> Is there a flag on tdb2.tdbloader to report time and triples per
> second?
> >>>
> >>> I have noticed that storage space use for tdbloader2 is significantly
> >>> smaller on disk compared to tdbloader and tdb2.tdbloader. Is there a
> >>> straight forward explanation here?
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>


-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA

Reply via email to