If you are interested ultimately in how the data looks (syntax) and if you can use JSON-LD to transport the data, there are some features in JSON-LD 1.1 that might help:
https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#aliasing-keywords https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#scoped-contexts Adam On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 8:27 AM Laura Morales <laure...@mail.com> wrote: > I have problems with the fact that, in English, words can have multiple > meanings and can also be used as verbs, nouns, etc. In RDF, I feel like I'm > compelled to define a term and its one meaning that is unique across the > entire vocabulary. If I want to use the same term to mean two or more > things, I have to use two dictionaries or I have to come up with weird > combinations of multiple words. You know, like > SimpleBeanFactoryAwareAspectInstanceFactory. > I was wondering if there is any way to define a term whose meaning depends > on the context. For example Lorem.foobar and Ipsum.foobar, "foobar" could > mean two entirely different things depending on whether it's a property of > the type Lorem or type Ipsum. AFAIK OWL defines domains/ranges for terms, > so maybe these can be used for this goal? What would be the practical > implications, for example if I were to use Fuseki without an OWL reasoner > (ie. just by loading a bunch of triples and start querying with SPARQL)? >
