Hi there,
There isn't enough information to see what's happening.
The first thing to do is dump, or Fuseki backup, the database from each
setup and see if they are the same.
Then if they are, send a minimal reproducible example [1].
Something someone else can run.
Andy
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example
On 11/08/2021 13:35, [email protected] wrote:
Hello,
My jena-fuseki database consists of several named graphs. In order to
provide users graphql-like interface to jena-fuseki I have to combine my
NGs into one big default graph for HyperGraphql
(https://www.hypergraphql.org/) that provides the interface.
At some point the users started to get less data than before and when I
investigated the issue I noticed that this was after upgrading
jena-fuseki from 3.13 to 3.17 !
To combine the NGs I'm using the following command:
curl -i -H "Content-Type: application/sparql-update" -X POST
http://<myTargetHost>:8061/<myDs>/update --data-binary
"@./combine-NGs.sparql"
(see NGs_to_be_combined.txt for hint of my source database and
combine-NGs.sparql as the executed script).
So I run the combine-NGs.sparql-script in the target jena host and the
target dataset.
If I use in-memory dataset as my target dataset I get only half of the
triplets cmapared to the amount of triplets with persistent dataset.
This happens only with jena-fuseki 3.17.
In 3.13 I haven't seen this issue!
Br, Jaana
