On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 at 11:12, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Could you point to this dependency in the specs because I can't find > mention of JSONschema. > > "schema" mentions are schema.org (for examples), XMLSchema (for > datatypes) and RDF schema for termninology.
I (a different Dan) dug around out of curiosity. I could not find a formal dependency in the W3C standard but there does seem to have been some communication and collaboration between JSON Schema and JSON-LD teams, eg to characterise (subsets of) the former using the latter. Dan > > > Andy > > On 23/04/2022 20:21, Dan Davis wrote: > > It has always bothered me that JSONSchema is not an official standard in > > the way that XML and RDF/XML are. I know that JSON-LD 1 and 2 are more > > standardized under W3C, but they depend so much on JSONSchema. Last I > > checked, JSON Schema DRAFT 4 was the closest to a schema. Is the story > any > > better now? > > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 2:40 PM Paul Tyson <phty...@sbcglobal.net> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> On Apr 23, 2022, at 12:16, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> What should the default settings be JSON-LD 1.0 or 1.1? > >>> > >> 1.1 would better meet my use cases. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> —Paul > >> > >> > > >
