Thank you for the clarification Andy and I would agree your proposed approach sounds good.
--- Marco Neumann On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 at 15:06, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > We have had reports that are AI-inspired and it looks liek some PRs are > AI assisted. > > I've used copilot to convert over half of the JUnit3 usage to JUnit 5/6. > (To converting Junit4 to JUnit6, I use a perl script.) > > Any contribution is still the personal responsibility of the submitter. > AI is a tool. There isn't a new route whereby AI is committing to the > codebase. > > Good use of AI is also to use its research and problem solving. I see > reports across OSS projects where reports are huge - whatever text > Claude et al is writing. > > That still takes a human to process and that can't all be on the > reviewers. Again, there is a responsibility of the reporter to produce > something focused, like any good report. Provide everything as an > appendix, not as the sole description. > > Andy > > On 31/07/2026 11:17, Marco Neumann wrote: > > Thank You Andy and team for another fresh release of Apache Jena, TBD and > > RDF tools. > > > > I read that GenAI started being used in this development cycle. Can you > > give us a quick update on what that means? Are changes proposed > dynamically > > by Copilot for approval and tabled for merging? Or was this just an > > independent development branch that caused some concern in the recent > > release? > > > > Best, > > Marco >
