The new producer and the new offset management are already in trunk. The new consumer is to be developed.
Thanks, Jun On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Kane Kane <kane.ist...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jun, is new producer, consumer and offset management in the > trunk already? Can we start developing libraries with 0.8.2 support > against trunk? > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, 0.8.2 is compatible with 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 in terms of wire protocols > > and the upgrade can be done in place. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Michal Michalski < > > michal.michal...@boxever.com> wrote: > > > >> One more question regarding 0.8.2 - is it planned to be a in-place, > >> no-downtime release (I'm using 0.8.0 now)? By looking at the version > number > >> changes only I'd guess it is, but... ;-) > >> > >> Michal > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Michał Michalski, > >> michal.michal...@boxever.com > >> > >> > >> On 8 July 2014 18:22, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Joe, > >> > > >> > I had a question for you in that RB since I don't fully understand it. > >> > Maybe you can help clarify how the fix works. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Joel > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:55:56AM -0400, Joe Stein wrote: > >> > > I wrote it, so I can't commit it without other committers agreeing. > >> > > > >> > > Last I recall I updated the patch from the feedback in the > reviewboard > >> > but > >> > > haven't looked at it in months. > >> > > > >> > > I am glad though it resolved the issue you were having and we can > >> figure > >> > > how to get the patch to work with 0.8.1.1 if you run into problems. > >> > > > >> > > /******************************************* > >> > > Joe Stein > >> > > Founder, Principal Consultant > >> > > Big Data Open Source Security LLC > >> > > http://www.stealth.ly > >> > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > >> > > ********************************************/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Is there a blocker to getting the patch for kafka-1180 applied? > Is > >> the > >> > > > patch for 0.8.0 no longer compatible for trunk? I'm actually > going > >> to > >> > see > >> > > > if I can get it to work for 0.8.1.1 today. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > >> > > > Jason > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Two biggest features in 0.8.2 are Kafka-based offset management > and > >> > the > >> > > > new > >> > > > > producer. We are in the final stage of testing them. We also > >> haven't > >> > > > fully > >> > > > > tested the delete topic feature. So, we are probably 4-6 weeks > away > >> > from > >> > > > > releasing 0.8.2. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > For kafka-1180, the patch hasn't been applied yet and we will > need > >> a > >> > > > patch > >> > > > > for trunk. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Jun > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Jason Rosenberg < > j...@squareup.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > What's the status for an 0.8.2 release? We are currently > using > >> > 0.8.0, > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > > would like to upgrade to take advantage of some of the > per-topic > >> > > > > retention > >> > > > > > options available now in 0.8.1. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > However, we'd also like to take advantage of some fixes > coming in > >> > 0.8.2 > >> > > > > > (e.g. deleting topics). > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Also, we have been using a patch for ( > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1180) applied to > >> > 0.8.0. > >> > > > > This > >> > > > > > is marked as scheduled for 0.8.2, with a patch available, but > I'm > >> > not > >> > > > > sure > >> > > > > > if this has been committed and applied to the 0.8.2 branch > yet. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Jason > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> >
