Many thanks for the clarification, Jun!

Michael


> On 16.09.2014, at 02:11, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, that description is not precise. We do allow dots in general. However,
> a topic can't be just "." or "..".
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jun
> 
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Michael G. Noll <
> michael+st...@michael-noll.com> wrote:
> 
>> Ah -- I only tested with dots "."
>> 
>> However, haven't you said earlier in this thread that only "-" and "_" are
>> allowed as special chars?  This would exclude dots, although in the error
>> message below they (dots) are said to be fine.  Is this a bug or a feature?
>> ;-)
>> 
>> --Michael
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 14.09.2014, at 20:41, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Actually, we do give you an error if an invalid topic is created through
>>> CLI. When we add a create topic api, we can return the correct error code
>>> too.
>>> 
>>> bin/kafka-topics.sh --zookeeper localhost:2181 --create --topic="te+dd"
>>> --partitions 1 --replication-factor 1
>>> 
>>> Error while executing topic command topic name te+dd is illegal,
>> contains a
>>> character other than ASCII alphanumerics, '.', '_' and '-'
>>> 
>>> kafka.common.InvalidTopicException: topic name te+dd is illegal,
>> contains a
>>> character other than ASCII alphanumerics, '.', '_' and '-'
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jun
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Michael G. Noll <
>> mich...@michael-noll.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Wouldn't it be helpful to throw an error or a warning if the user
>>>> tries to create a topic with an invalid name?  Currently neither the
>>>> API nor the CLI tools inform you that you are naming a topic in a way
>>>> you shouldn't.
>>>> 
>>>> And as Otis pointed out elsewhere in this thread this ties back into
>>>> the JMX/MBean issues related the usage of "-"/dashes and
>>>> "_"/underscores, which are unfortunately the only non-alphanumeric
>>>> characters that are at your disposal to add reasonable "structure" to
>>>> your Kafka topic names. (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1481)
>>>> 
>>>> Do you mind sharing your topic naming convention at LinkedIn?
>>>> 
>>>> --Michael
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11.09.2014 00:24, Jun Rao wrote:
>>>>> We actually don't allow "." in the topic name. Topic name can be
>>>>> alpha-numeric plus "-" and "_".
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jun
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Bhavesh Mistry
>>>>> <mistry.p.bhav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks, I was using without JMX.  I will go through doc.  But how
>>>>>> about Topic or Metric name Topic Name Convention or Metric Name
>>>>>> Convention ?  The dot notation with topic having a ".".  Any
>>>>>> future plan to enforce some stand rules.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bhavesh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Bhavesh,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Each of those JMX attributes comes with documentation. If you
>>>>>>> open up jconsole and attach to a jvm running the consumer you
>>>>>>> should be able to read the descriptions for each attribute.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Jay
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Bhavesh Mistry
>>>>>>> <mistry.p.bhav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Kafka Team,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can you please let me know what each of following Metrics
>>>>>>>> means ?  Some
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> them are obvious, but some are hard to understand. My Topic
>>>>>>>> name is *TOPIC_NAME*.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> can we enforce a Topic Name Convention or Metric Name
>>>>>>>> Convention.
>>>>>>> Because
>>>>>>>> in previous version of Kafka, we have similar issue of
>>>>>>>> parsing Kafka Metrics name with host name issue (codahale
>>>>>>>> lib) .  I have topic name
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> “.”  So, it is hard to distinguish metric name and topic.
>>>>>>>> Also,  when guys get chance I would appreciate if you guys
>>>>>>>> can explain metric description on wiki so community would
>>>>>>>> know what to monitor.  Please
>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>> below for full list of metrics from new producer.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Bhavesh
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> record-queue-time-avg NaN *node-1.*request-latency-max
>>>>>>>> -Infinity record-size-max -Infinity
>>>>>>>> *node-1.*incoming-byte-rate NaN request-size-avg NaN
>>>>>>>> *node-1.*request-latency-avg NaN *node-2.*request-size-avg
>>>>>>>> NaN requests-in-flight 0.0 bufferpool-wait-ratio NaN
>>>>>>>> network-io-rate NaN metadata-age 239.828
>>>>>>>> records-per-request-avg NaN record-retry-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> buffer-total-bytes 6.7108864E7 buffer-available-bytes
>>>>>>>> 6.7108864E7 topic.*TOPIC_NAME*.record-error-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> record-send-rate NaN select-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> node-2.outgoing-byte-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> topic.*TOPIC_NAME*.record-retry-rate NaN batch-size-max
>>>>>>>> -Infinity connection-creation-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> node-1.outgoing-byte-rate NaN topic.*TOPIC_NAME*.byte-rate
>>>>>>>> NaN waiting-threads 0.0 batch-size-avg NaN io-wait-ratio NaN
>>>>>>>> io-wait-time-ns-avg NaN io-ratio NaN
>>>>>>>> topic.TOPIC_NAME.record-send-rate NaN request-size-max
>>>>>>>> -Infinity record-size-avg NaN request-latency-max -Infinity
>>>>>>>> node-2.request-latency-max -Infinity record-queue-time-max
>>>>>>>> -Infinity node-2.response-rate NaN node-1.request-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> node-1.request-size-max -Infinity connection-count 3.0
>>>>>>>> incoming-byte-rate NaN compression-rate-avg NaN request-rate
>>>>>>>> NaN node-1.response-rate NaN node-2.request-latency-avg NaN
>>>>>>>> request-latency-avg NaN record-error-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> connection-close-rate NaN *node-2.*request-size-max
>>>>>>>> -Infinity topic.TOPIC_NAME.compression-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> node-2.incoming-byte-rate NaN node-1.request-size-avg NaN
>>>>>>>> io-time-ns-avg NaN outgoing-byte-rate NaN
>>>>>>>> *node-2*.request-rate NaN response-rate NaN
>> 

Reply via email to